A good opinion by a California appellate court last week. Apologies for the delay in posting this; just dropped the in-laws off at LAX and am catching up on things.
At any rate, I say "good" rather than "great" because while Martinez v. Robledo holds that companion animal owners may recover reasonable costs for the treatment of a wrongfully injured companion - as opposed to mere market value - the court expressly stops short of acknowledging any sentimental, intrinsic or other value. Very disappointing for a state that often leads the nation in progressive thinking in so many other regards.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment